top of page
highly rated permanent makeup artist.png

Ink4Girls PERMANENT MAKEUP
because only the best will do

  • Facebook

Myth-Busting Nano Brows: Is It Really the Most Gentle Way to Create Hair-Stroke Eyebrows?

  • Writer: Permanent Makeup
    Permanent Makeup
  • 6 days ago
  • 3 min read
ree



In the permanent makeup world, trends come and go faster than your anesthetic wears off. And one of the hottest, most over-romanticized buzzwords right now? Nano brows.


The pitch sounds dreamy: “It’s the most gentle way to create realistic hair strokes!”Well… let’s go ahead and pop that bubble with a mix of professionalism and just a dash of humor from someone who’s been in this industry long enough to remember when dial-up internet was a thing.

Spoiler: Nano brows are not inherently the most gentle method.

Let’s talk about why.


The Myth: “Nano Brows Are the Gentlest Hair-Stroke Technique.”

Many artists promote nano brows as the perfect alternative when microblading isn’t appropriate—especially for clients with certain skin types or contraindications. Others recommend powder brows simply because they cannot perform nano work. And then there are the bold (or overly confident) few who claim:

“Nano is the gentlest possible way to implant hair-like strokes.”

That statement sounds lovely… but it isn’t true.

The Reality: A Single Needle Can Still Cut Skin

Nano brows are created with a machine—usually a permanent makeup device—and a single needle with a long taper. That long taper is marketed as delicate, refined, elegant… practically angelic.

But let’s be honest from a technician’s perspective:

A single needle can absolutely cut the skin.

Anyone who has done tattooing or permanent makeup for more than five minutes knows the truth: A single needle is capable of slicing the skin just as easily as a microblade—especially when used incorrectly, too aggressively, or with the wrong machine.

Need proof?

We never use a single liner needle for eyeliner procedures because it is notorious for:

  • Going too deep

  • Cutting the tissue

  • Creating blowouts or migration


If a tool is risky in the eyelid—one of the thinnest, most delicate areas of the face—how could it automatically be marketed as “the gentlest” for brows?


When Nano Can Be Gentle—And When It Absolutely Cannot

Now, to be fair and factual:

When performed by a seasoned artist using:

  • A high-quality PMU machine (not a body tattoo machine with a long stroke),

  • Proper depth control,

  • A true light-handed technique, and

  • The correct needle configuration…


Nano brows can be gentler than microblading and produce crisp, clean hair strokes that heal beautifully.

But this is dependent on something very important.

The Artist.

Not just the tool. Not the trend. Not the marketing.

Nano brows are only gentle in the right hands. In the wrong hands, they are just as traumatic—sometimes more so—than microblading.


The Original Most-Gentle Technique (And It’s Not Nano OR Microblading)

Before microblading became a household word…before machines became the default…before Instagram told everyone what brow style they needed


We already had a manual, extremely gentle way to create hair strokes. I know, I was there and I was doing "hair strokes" or "hair simulation".


Manual SofTap needle method.

Long before microblading existed, there were some artists (I am one of them) who created hair strokes using a manual needle grouping applied with a tapping technique—not slicing, not dragging, not carving and not with a machine. Just soft, precise tapping.


And then one day, someone took that exact same manual needle grouping, dragged it across the skin, it made a cut that pigment was deposited into that looked like a little hair. That was the moment microblading was born. Was it a new tool being used? No, It was just a tool we already had and it was not redesigned in any way that was simply used differently. It was only after a few years of the marketing of "microblading" was in play that some new thinner diameters or "nano blades" were created but essentially they still remained the same basic concept design.


So let’s be clear:

Soft-tap manual method = tapping (gentle)

Microblading = dragging (cutting)

And that original tapping technique?

It is still, to this day, likely the gentlest way to implant hair-like strokes into the skin. It provides greater precision and control. Sure, it can cause damage but you almost have to really go out of your way to overwork the skin with this method.


Companies like Softap pioneered this method decades ago. They were creating feathered, natural brow strokes long before “microblading” became a global trend.


It worked.


It healed beautifully. And it didn’t require a machine or create unnecessary trauma.


So… Which Technique Is the Gentlest?

Here’s the final truth, backed by both science and history:

✔ Most likely to be the gentlest of all methods: Manual SoftTap hair stroke method

✔ Gentler than microblading depending on the artist: Nano brows

✔ Most likely to traumatize: Microblading


Nano brows are not automatically gentle and any method can potentially cause damage in the wrong hands.. No method is totally trauma-free. Nano brows can be a great option—but only when done correctly.

And that is the myth officially busted.


Comments


bottom of page